Evidence: | 'Did you read Sir W Hamilton on Cousin's Metaphysics in the last Edinburgh Review? And what inferences are we to draw from it? Pity that Sir W. had not the gift of delivery! He has real knowledge on those matters; but all unsorted, and tumbled topsy-turvy like a "bankrupt stock."' |
||||||||||
Century: | 1800-1849 | ||||||||||
Date: | Between 1 Oct 1829 and 21 Dec 1829 | ||||||||||
Country: | Scotland | ||||||||||
Time: | evening | ||||||||||
Place: | n/a | ||||||||||
Type of Experience (Reader): |
|
||||||||||
Type of Experience (Listener): |
|
Reader: | Thomas Carlyle |
Age | Adult (18-100+) |
Gender | Male |
Date of Birth | 4 Dec 1795 |
Socio-economic group: | Professional / academic / merchant / farmer |
Occupation: | Writer / Academic |
Religion: | Lapsed Calvinist |
Country of origin: | Scotland |
Country of experience: | Scotland |
Listeners present if any: (e.g. family, servants,
friends, workmates) |
n/a |
Additional comments: | n/a |
Author: | Sir William Hamilton |
Title: | Review of Victor Cousin's 'Cours de Philosophie' (Paris, 1828) in Edinburgh Review, XCIV (OCt 1829), 194-221 |
Genre: | Essays / Criticism |
Form of Text: | Print: Serial / periodicalUnknown |
Publication details: | Edition XCIV (October 1829), 194-221 |
Provenance: | unknown |
Record ID: | 28587 | |
Source - | ||
Author: | Thomas Carlyle | |
Editor: | C. R. Sanders | |
Title: | The Collected Letters of Thomas and Jane Welsh Carlyle | |
Place of Publication: | Durham, North Carolina | |
Date of Publication: | 1970 | |
Vol: | 5 | |
Page: | 46 | |
Additional comments: | n/a |
Citation: | Thomas Carlyle, C. R. Sanders (ed.), The Collected Letters of Thomas and Jane Welsh Carlyle (Durham, North Carolina, 1970), 5, p. 46, http://can-red-lec.library.dal.ca/Arts/reading/recorddetails2.php?id=28587, accessed: 10 June 2023 |
Taken from letter from TC to David Aitken, dated 21st December 1829, written at Craigenputtoch, Dumfries. Pages 44-46 in this edition. Date range is an estimate based on date of this letter and publication date of the edition - but Carlyle refers to the same review in a letter to John Wilson dated 19th December, which implies that he had not read it on that date, so the date range may be smaller. |
Reading Experience Database version 2.0. Page updated: 27th Apr 2016 3:15pm (GMT)